Fossil fuels and fossil fools in India

‘‘People in India, unlike the West, don’t understand the seriousness of climate change….They think global warming is a fantasy. Indians are using fossil fuel like never before. We have constructed oven-like buildings and spend enormous energy cooling them.’’

I came across these words by the well known Indian environmental film-maker Mike Pandey in an article in NewIndPress that surveyed how Indian documentary film-makers are rising to the challenge of communicating climate change.

The article, ‘Meltdown on Film’ published on 15 March 2007 highlights the formidable task of raising awareness in India, now one of the fastest growing economies in the world, consuming larger volumes of fossil fuels every year.

Mike knows what he’s talking about: his film Global Warming went largely unnoticed when it was released in India three years ago.

And he is one of India’s top notch film makers on environment, wildlife and natural history. He has won three Panda Awards — also known as the ‘Green Oscar’ — at the Wildscreen Film Festival held every other year in Bristol, UK — and considered to be the most important festival of its kind in the world. (Modest cough: I was on the jury of Wildscreen 2000, when we gave Mike one of his three Green Oscars.)

Viewer apathy is not the only problem that India’s environmental film-makers have to contend with. Here’s an extract from the article:

Like any environmentalist, our documentary filmmakers are “concerned” about issues like global warming. But the lacklustre reactions of research agencies (who ‘‘support” the cause but don’t really come forward to fund documentaries), zero interest from broadcasters who, according to one filmmaker, prefer ‘‘sexy environmental stories’’, together with viewer apathy, are the reasons why the few impressive documentary films on climate change vanish after a few screenings at festivals. Take the Public Service Broadcast Trust’s (PSBT) Open Frame, for instance, the annual documentary film festival held in Delhi. Or the roving environmental and wildlife film festival CMS Vatavaran, where open discussions are held after every screening. Barely a couple of films are chosen by the public broadcaster Doordarshan after they are screened at these two festivals, which is why most of the documentaries don’t ever reach the masses.

‘‘Public interest stories and documentaries are the last thing broadcasters want to show,’’ quips Pandey. ‘‘People like me are lucky to have found space on DD. Value-based programmes are nudged out so easily by broadcasters these days.”

The article continues:

A few years ago, when Mike Pandey returned to his favourite spot in Austria to capture a snowcap for one of his films, he was shocked to see it had melted. He says, ‘‘I had seen the ice cap the previous year. I had to go deeper into the area to get my shots. It’s common in Austria to see ice caps vanishing. You see blossoms and splendid crops in many areas.’’ After Earth Matters, which is being shown on Doordarshan, Pandey is coming up with a series of six films on global warming, which will talk about ‘‘using alternative energy for the future.’’

Whenever out for shoots at Lakshwadeep, Kochi and Gujarat, Mike has been noticing ‘‘visible changes’’ in ‘‘ocean ferocity’’ and where the sea neighbours the land. ‘‘The water has come in a bit more into the land over the years,’’ he observes.

‘‘You don’t have to be a scientist to notice these changes; you can see it all happening now. Unfortunately, people living along the Indian coastline will be the first ones to face any kind of major impact,’’ he adds.

On my visit to Hyderabad last week, I was told that there are now close to 50 TV channels that cover news and current affairs on a 24/7 basis (in English and other Indian languages). Yet this kind of news hardly seems to make the headlines….it’s probably moving too slowly.

Mike Pandey and other environmental film-makers have their work cut out for them.

“If (Indian cricketer) Sachin Tendulkar or (Bollywood star) Shah Rukh Khan loses his cell phone, the news will reach every nook and corner of the country, but the fact that iodine is essential for the human body is still not known widely,” Mike told India’s Frontline news magazine in 2004. Read full article: Nature’s film-maker in Frontline of 18-31 Dec 2004

Read TVE Asia Pacific website feature on Mike Pandey’s 2003 film on the whale shark in India

4 Responses to “Fossil fuels and fossil fools in India”

  1. hates brithish bullshit Says:

    oh so its all right for you basterd british to go looting steeling cuntrys around the world but the second any 1 els dose you got a big problem it all gud for you fukers to use cars and mega bombs that releases alot of co2 but not for a cuntry that is still developing thanks to basterd brithish who looted it for over 700 years

    you basterd dirty british…
    go learn your disgusting hitory

  2. Nalaka Gunawardene Says:

    I have allowed the above comment despite the spiteful language because it is a persistent (and valid) argument in the climate change debate. Valid — but not very helpful in finding solutions. Debate won’t advance on these polemical positions.

    This is what we noted in a statement issued at the end of an Asian workshop on ‘Changing Climate and Moving Pictures’, held on 3 – 4 October 2008 in, Tokyo, Japan, organised by TVE Japan ( in collaboration with TVE Asia Pacific ( We noted:

    “Bickering on who is historically responsible for the current climate crisis has become a highly political issue at intergovernmental forums. Such introspection is necessary and useful, but excessive focus on that historical debate does not help prepare countries and societies to live with climate change impacts. While acknowledging the historical trends that have caused climate change, we need to evolve the discussion in search of economically, politically and technologically viable solutions. The media can play its part in this maturing process.”

    Full statement available at:

    • Student Says:

      Your article is opinionated. While I don’t agree with ‘hates brithish bullshit’ as regards language, it is true that the west is far more responsible for emission levels than India, as shown here:
      You will see that the USA has a world total of ~20% while India is 5%. When you consider the population of both those countries, you will see the per capita emissions are far far greater in the west. Also, South India has already developed numerous alternative projects and has banned plastics as well. South India is disciplined; The north will catch up. And this is considering, the divisionist and extortionist policies of the UK for 190 years, which ended very recently and with 2 partitions, destroying some industries along with it, one of them being the cotton industry where most industrial units went to India and most fields to Pakistan (or vice versa, I’m not sure.). Compare this to the USA where every ordinary working family has atleast 2 cars, and what do you get?

  3. debu Says:

    Bickering?. U probably know dat 10 % of the West’s poorest produce as much CO2 as 10 % of the richest in India (and the poor countries of the south?). Let those rich become more humble and reduce their CONSUMPTIONS. .then talk to the rest. Why r they ready to part with so much of their money just to ensure curbs in the poor countries?…..and the Carbon credit farce??. Who r u trying to bullshit?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: