Waveless, Eco-friendly Boat wins the ‘Ray Award’ 2012

I S W Karunathilaka, winner of the ‘Ray Award’ 2012. Photo by Mevan Peiris/Snap Photography

I S W Karunathilaka, inventor of a waveless boat design that saves fuel and protects river banks, won the inaugural Ray Award for nurturing innovation excellence in Sri Lanka.

An accountant turned entrepreneur, he received the award at a gala awards ceremony held on 17 October 2012 at the Cinnamon Lakeside Hotel, Colombo, amidst an international audience.

The Commercial Bank has offered a grant worth LKR 1 million to assist Karunathilaka to prepare his invention for commercialisation, while the University of Moratuwa will provide technical advice and guidance.

Six Lankan inventors, already honoured with Presidential Awards for Innovation in recent years, were shortlisted for the award. Coming from diverse backgrounds and training, each had designed or produced a practical solution to an everyday need.

The Ray Award is a biennial, life-time award given in memory of the late Ray Wijewardene, the foremost inventor produced by Sri Lanka, to help a state recognised inventor to commercialise his or her invention. It is administered and presented by the Ray Wijewardene Charitable Trust (RWCT) in collaboration with the Sri Lanka Inventors Commission (SLIC) and the Commercial Bank.

Prototype of waveless eco-boat designed by I S W Karunatilake
The waveless boat is non-symmetric in shape: rectangular on the outside, but has curves facing the inside. It contains twin hulls, which allow water to travel through the hollow mid section and prevents waves being formed on the boat’s sides as it moves.

The boat is eco friendly in other ways too. It consumes less fuel as energy is not wasted in wave generation. Unlike conventional boats made from fibre glass, Karunathilaka’s vessel is made of steel and aluminium, with an anodic protection which reduces corrosion.

He has already built a prototype that can carry up to 50 passengers or 4,000 kg of cargo, which has been operating on the Kalu Ganga since late 2011.
“It was late Dr Ray Wijewardene’s vision and dream to see Sri Lanka develop economically through inventiveness and innovation,” said Dr Tissa Vitarana, Senior Minister of Scientific Affairs, who was chief guest. “The Ray Award celebrates what he stood for.”

“Our inventors need state recognition, society’s appreciation and funding to commercialise their ideas. We really need a good venture capital bank in Sri Lanka to support our inventors – this is what had made a difference in advanced economies like the United States,” he added.

Dr Vitarana noted that only 2 per cent of Sri Lanka’s exports received a high technology input at the moment. He underlined the need for Sri Lanka to develop its own technologies responding the country’s particular needs and powered by the country’s own innovative and enterprising people.

He hoped that RWCT would help Sri Lanka to achieve what the late Ray Wijewardene had in mind: for Sri Lanka to become a developed country without the problems of poverty.

Deepal Sooriyaarachchi, Commissioner of the Sri Lanka Inventors Commission and member of the selection panel said the Ray Award is a celebration of Lankan inventiveness. Long-listed candidates were assessed on three criteria, or three ‘I’s: Invention, Innovation and Impact.

Professor Malik Ranasinghe, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of RWCT, said the Trust supports innovations in sustainable agriculture, renewable energy, engineering and aeronautics – disciplines and pursuits that were close to Ray’s heart. “We hope that ‘The Ray’ will help to create the next Ray Wijewardene in Sri Lanka.”

All past winners of the Presidential Awards for innovation, presented by SLIC, were eligible and invited to apply for the Ray Award. The Trust received a total of 56 applications, which were reviewed by an independent panel that interviewed 17 candidates.

The selection panel was chaired by Prof Uditha Liyanage, Director and Chairman of the Board of Management, Postgraduate Institute of Management (PIM) affiliated to University of Sri Jayawardenapura.

A documentary featuring the six shortlisted inventors, produced by Ray Wijewardene’s grandson Rehan Alexander Mudannayake, was screened during the awards ceremony.

Ray Award 2012 Winner and shortlisted candidates with Dr Tissa Vitarana, Senior Minister of Science

Malima Episode #13: Have a good night – and a cool glass of water!

Malima (New Directions in Innovation) is a Sinhala language TV series on science, technology and innovation. This episode was produced and first broadcast by Sri Lanka’s Rupavahini TV channel on 27 September 2012.

Malima: Episode 13 (first broadcast 27 Sep 2012) from Nalaka Gunawardene on Vimeo.

Produced by Suminda Thilakasena and hosted by science writer Nalaka Gunawardene, this episode features the following items:

• An interview with inventor Nalaka Chandrawansa, who has developed an energy-efficient fan that can be fitted under a mosquito net. It consumes less than 20W to operate, compared with table fans (average 45W) and ceiling fans (average 70W), accumulating power savings. And because the compact fan provides a more targeted stream of air that cools the sleeper on the bed, it also does not stir dust elsewhere in the room that sometimes causes health problems. This innovation has been grated a Sri Lanka Patent, certified by Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority and won a President’s Award in 2010. It is manufactured and marketed by the inventor himself. Details at: http://www.freshnight.net

• Introducing Sri Lanka’s indigenous technology: kedella karuwa, a simple tool for sweeping outdoors, which might have inspired the rake.

• A Japanese company has recently introduced the innovative ‘Grappa’ foldable shopping bag — which also doubles as a safety helmet in the case of a disaster. It is made of mesh fabric sides, much like a standard reusable shopping bag, but the bottom consists of hard plastic and expanded polystyrene (EPS), which is often found in safety helmets to absorb impact. More about this at: http://www.springwise.com/health_wellbeing/japanese-eco-friendly-shopping-bag-doubles-safety-helmet/

• An interview with schoolboy inventor Therusha Chethana Fernando, a student of De Mazenod College, Kandana, Sri Lanka. He has developed a portable water cooler that can chill water to 5 degrees C below outside temperature without using refrigeration technology or electricity. Instead, the simple device uses a permeable clay container and a battery-powered small fan. With 3 litres of water filled, the entire unit weighs 4 kg, easy enough to carry around.

සිවුමංසල කොලූගැටයා #83: රසායනික පොහොර උගුලෙන් කාම්බෝජය ගලවා ගත් විප්ලවවාදියා

This week’s Ravaya column (in Sinhala) is about a maverick scientist: Dr Yang Saing Koma. For 15 years, this Cambodian agronomist has driven a grassroots revolution that is changing farming and livelihoods in one of the least developed countries in Asia.

A champion of farmer-led innovation in sustainable agriculture, Koma founded the Cambodian Centre for Study and Development in Agriculture (CEDAC) in 1997. Today, it is the largest agricultural and rural development organisation in Cambodia, supporting 140,000 farmer families in 21 provinces.

He has just been honoured as one of this year’s six recipients of the Ramon Magsaysay Awards — the Asian Nobel Prize. I wrote about him in a recent English column too.

Dr Yang Saing Koma, visionary behind Cambodia’s rice farming revolution – photo courtesy Cornell University SRI website

ලක් ගොවීන් රසායනික පොහොරට දැඩි සේ ඇබ්බැහි වීම ගැන ගිය සතියේ මා කළ විග‍්‍රහයට හොඳ ප‍්‍රතිචාර ලැබුණා. එ අතර කෘෂි විද්‍යා ක්‍ෂෙත‍්‍රය ද මනාව දත් පාඨකයකු කීවේ “ශ‍්‍රී ලංකාව වැනි කුඩා දුප්පත් රටවලට මෙබඳු ගෝලීය ප‍්‍රවණතාවලට එරෙහිවීමට අවශ්‍ය වුවත් ලෙහෙසියෙන් කළ නොහැකි බවයි”.

ඕනෑ ම ඇබ්බැහිකමකින් අත්මිදීම අසීරුයි. එහෙත් අපේ රට ඇතැම් දෙනා සිතන තරම් කුඩා හෝ “අසරණ” හෝ නොවන බව මා මීට පෙර මේ කොලමින් සාක්‍ෂි සහිතව පෙන්වා දී තිබෙනවා. ඕනෑකම හා අධිෂ්ඨානය ඇත්නම් අපේ අයාලේ ගිය කෘෂි ක්‍ෂෙත‍්‍රය නැවතත් යහපත් ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති හා පුරුදුවලට යොමු කර ගත හැකියි.

ගෝලීය පසුබිම තුළ අපේ රටේ “අසරණකම” ගැන අශූභවාදී තර්ක කරන අයට මා ගෙන හැර දක්වන්නේ අපටත් වඩා කුඩා, දුගී බවින් අධික ආසියානු රටවල් යහ අරමුණු සාර්ථක ලෙස ජය ගන්නා හැටියි. රසායනික පොහොර මත අධික ලෙස යැපීමේ හරිත විප්ලව සංකල්පයෙන් මෑතදී ඉවත් වූ කාම්බෝජයේ උදාහරණය මා අද මතු කරන්නට කැමතියි.

1958 සිට පිලිපීනයේ ස්වාධීන පදනමක් විසින් වාර්ෂිකව පිරිනමනු ලබන රේමන් මැග්සායිසායි ත්‍යාගය (Ramon Magsaysay Award) ආසියානු නොබෙල් ත්‍යාගය ලෙස හඳුන්වනවා. එය පිරිනමන්නේ සිය රටට, සමාජයට හා ලෝකයට සුවිශේෂී සේවයක් කරන අයටයි.

2012 මැග්සායිසායි ත්‍යාග අගෝස්තු 31 වනදා පිලිපීනයේ මැනිලා අගනුවරදී උත්සවාකාරයෙන් පිරිනමනු ලැබුවා. එහිදී මහජන සේවය සඳහා වන මැග්සායිසායි ත්‍යාගය කාම්බෝජයේ ආචාර්ය යැං සයිංග් කෝමාට (Dr. Yang Saing Koma) හිමි වුණා. සිය රටෙහි ගොවිතැන් කටයුතුවල නිහඬ විප්ලවයක් කරමින් සහල් නිෂ්පාදනය වැඩි කරන අතර ගොවීන්ගේ ජීවන තත්ත්වය හා ආත්ම අභිමානය දියුණු කිරීම ත්‍යාගයේ හේතු පාඨය ලෙස සඳහන් වුණා.

ආසියාවේ වඩාත් දුගී දුප්පත්කම වැඩි රටක් වන කාම්බෝජයේ ඒක පුද්ගල දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතය (GDP) ඩොලර් 930යි. එරට සමස්ත ආර්ථික නිෂ්පාදනයෙන් සියයට 33ක් ලැබෙන්නේ බෝග වගාවෙන් හා සත්ත්ව පාලනයෙන්. එරට මිලියන් 14ක ජනයාගෙන් තුනෙන් දෙකක් ජීවිකාව සපයා ගන්නේ් වී ගොවිතැනින්.

සිය රටේ ජීවන තත්ත්වය නඟා සිටුවීමට නම් වී ගොවිතැනින් පටන් ගත යුතු බව ජර්මන් සරසවියකින් ශෂ්‍ය විද්‍යාවේ ආචාර්ය උපාධියක් ලබා 1995දී සිය රට පැමිණි ආචාර්ය කෝමා මනා සේ වටහා ගත්තා. එහෙත් බටහිරින් උගෙන අපේ වැනි රටවලට ආපසු පැමිණ එ් දැනුම ගෙඩි පිටින් ආරෝපණය කරන උගතුන්වට වඩා කෝමා වෙනස් චරිතයක්.

ඔහුට ක‍්‍රමීය චින්තනයක් තිබෙනවා. ප‍්‍රශ්නවල මුල සොයා ගවේෂණය කිරීමත්, රෝග ලක්‍ෂණවලට මතුපිටින් ප‍්‍රතිකර්ම යොදනවා වෙනුවට රෝග නිධාන සොයා ප‍්‍රතිචාර දැක්වීමත් ඔහුගේ ක‍්‍රමවේදයයි.

ගොවීන්ගේ අවශ්‍යතාවන්ට කේන්ද්‍ර වූ ගොවිතැන් පිළිවෙත් මතු කර ගැනීම මුල පටන් ම කෝමාගේ ප‍්‍රමුඛතාවය වුණා. බොහෝ රටවල් කරන්නේ ජාතික අස්වනු ඉලක්ක සාදා ගෙන, එවා සාක්ෂාත් කරන්නට ගොවීන් ඉත්තන් සේ යොදා ගැනීමයි. එ මහා පරිමාණ ව්‍යාපෘතිවලදී, කෙටි කාලීන අධික අස්වනු ලැබීම සඳහා උවමනාවට වඩා කෘෂි රසායන ද්‍රව්‍ය යොදමින් කඩිනම් අරගලයක් කරනවා. දේශපාලන උද්යෝගපාඨ හා ජාතිකාභිමානී ප‍්‍රකාශ හමාර වූ පසු ණය බරිත වූ ගොවීන් ගැන නිලධාරීන් හෝ දේශපාලකයන් හෝ තකන්නේ නැහැ (අඩු තරමින් ඊළඟ මැතිවරණය එලඹෙන තුරු!)

මේ ක‍්‍රමයට වෙනස් වූ, කළබල නැති, ගොවි හිතකාමී හා පරිසර හිතකාමී ක‍්‍රමවේදයන් ප‍්‍රගුණ කරන්නට 1997දී කෝමා ගොවි කටයුතු අධ්‍යයන හා සංවර්ධනයට කැප වූ කාම්බෝජියානු කේන්ද්‍රය (Cambodian Centre for Study and Development in Agriculture, CEDAC) නම් රාජ්‍ය නොවන, ස්වෙච්චා සංවිධානය ඇරඹුවා. වසර 15ක් තුළ CEDAC ගොවි කටයුතු හා ග‍්‍රාම සංවර්ධනය පිළිබඳ කාමිබෝජයේ විශාලතම ජනතා සංවිධානය බවට පත් වී තිබෙනවා. අද ඔවුන් පළාත් 21ක ගොවි පවුල් 140,000ක් සමඟ ගනුදෙනු කරනවා. ගොවි තොරතුරු ජාල හරහා තවත් විශාල ගොවි ජනතාවක දැනුම වැඩි කරනවා.

Dr Yang Saing Koma photo courtesy Friedrich Naumann Foundation Southeast & East Asia

ආචාර්ය කෝමා අප සාමාන්‍යයෙන් සිතින් මවා ගන්නා ආකාරයේ (රැවුල වවා ගත්, උද්‍යොගපාඨ කියමින් මොර දෙන) විප්ලවවාදියකු නොවෙයි. ඔහු සිරුරින් කෙසග, සිහින් හඬින් කථා කරන, ඉතා ආචාරශීලී පුද්ගලයෙක්. එහෙත් මේ කුඩා මිනිසා චින්තන විප්ලවයක් හරහා කාම්බෝජ ගොවිතැන නව මගකට යොමු කර තිබෙනවා. උගත්කමේ මාන්නය පොඩියක්වත් නැති මේ අපුරු විද්‍යාඥයා ගොවීන්, කෘෂි පර්යේෂකයන්, රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්, රාජ්‍ය නොවන සංවිධාන ක‍්‍රියාකාරිකයන් මෙන් ම අදාළ පෞද්ගලික සමාගම් නියෝජිතයින් සමඟත් සාමූහිකව කටයුතු කරමින් පොදු උන්නතියට ක‍්‍රියා කරන අයෙක්.

කෝමා සහ CEDAC ආයතනයේ බලපෑම ඉතා හොඳින් කියා පාන උදාහරණය නම් වී වගාවේ SRI ක‍්‍රමය (System of Rice Intensification) කාම්බෝජයේ ව්‍යාප්ත කිරීමයි. දශකයක් තුළ වී ගොවීන් 100,000කට වැඩි දෙනෙකු SRI ක‍්‍රමයට නම්මවා ගන්නටත්, එ් හරහා එරට වී අස්වැන්න 60%කින් වැඩි කරන අතර රසායනික පොහොර හා දෙමහුම් වී ප‍්‍රභේද භාවිතය බොහෝ සෙයින් අඩු කිරීමටත් හැකි වී තිබෙනවා.

2002දී ටොන් මිලියන 3.82ක් වූ කාම්බෝජ වාර්ෂික වී නිෂ්පාදනය 2010 වන විට ටොන් මිලියන් 7.97 දක්වා ඉහළ ගියා. මේ වර්ධනයට සැලකිය යුතු දායකත්වයක් SRI ක‍්‍රමය හරහා ලැබුණු බව එරට රජය පිළි ගන්නවා. 2005දී කාම්බෝජය නිල වශයෙන් SRI ක‍්‍රමය එරට වී නිෂ්පාදන ක‍්‍රමෝපායක් බවට පත් කළා.

වී වගාවේ SRI ක‍්‍රමය මුලින් ම අත්හදා බලා හඳුන්වා දුන්නේ අප‍්‍රිකා මහද්වීපයට සමීප මැඩගස්කාරයේයි. 1980 ගණන්වල සුළුවෙන් ඇරඹි මේ ක‍්‍රමය මේ වන විට වී වගා කරන ඝර්ම කලාපයේ බොහෝ රටවල පැතිරී තිබෙනවා. SRI ක‍්‍රමය මෙරටට හඳුන්වා දී ඇතත් එතරම් ප‍්‍රචලිත වී නැහැ.

SRI ක‍්‍රමයේදී උත්සාහ කරන්නේ වඩාත් සකසුරුවම් ලෙසින් වාරි ජලය යොදා ගෙන වී වගා කිරීමට. සාම්ප‍්‍රදායිකව කුඹුරුවලට විශාල ජල ප‍්‍රමාණයක් යොමු කරනවා. 1990 ගණන්වලදී ආචාර්ය රේ විජේවර්ධන වරක් මට කීවේ වී කිලෝ එකක් නිපදවන්නට වාරි ජලය ටොන් 20ක් පමණ යොදන බවයි. මේ ජලයෙන් ඉතා වැඩි ප‍්‍රමාණයක් කරන්නේ වෙල් යායේ වල් පැළෑටි බිහි වීම වැළැක්වීම. වී ශාකය වර්ධනයට එතරම් ජලය කන්දරාවක් උවමනා නැහැ.

වල් පැළෑටි පාලනය සඳහා ජලය වෙනුවට තෙත කොළරොඩු (leaf mulch) යොදන SRI ක‍්‍රමයේදී කුඹුරුවල ජල අවශ්‍යතාවය බාගයකටත් වඩා අඩු කරනවා. ජල හිඟයට නිතර මුහුණ දෙන අද කාලේ මෙය විශාල සහනයක්.

SRI ක‍්‍රමයේ තවත් වෙනසක් නම් ඉතා ලාබාල (දින 10-12) වියේදී ගොයම් පැළ නිශ්චිත දුරකින් කුඹුරේ සිටුවීමයි. එමෙන් ම ගොයම් පැළ අතර (පසට නයිට‍්‍රජන් පොහොර තනා දීමේ ස්වභාවික හැකියාව ඇති) වෙනත් බෝග වවන්නට (inter-cropping) ගොවීන් උනන්දු කරවනවා. මෙබඳු පියවර කිහිපයක් හරහා අඩු ජලයක් හා අඩු රසායනික පොහොර යොදා වුවත් හොඳ අස්වැන්නක් ලද හැකියි.

1999දී SRI ක‍්‍රමය ගැන විදෙස් සඟරාවක ලිපියක් කියවූ ආචාර්ය කෝමා මුලින් එය තමන්ගේ වෙල් යායේ අත්හදා බැලූවා. ”මට උවමනා වුයේ මේ සංකල්ප කාම්බෝජයේ තත්ත්වයන්ට ගැලපෙනවා ද යන්න තහවුරු කර ගන්නයි. එය ප‍්‍රතිථල පෙන්වන විට මා අසල්වැසි ගොවි මහතුන් කැඳවා එය පෙන්නුවා. මුලින් ඔවුන් මේ ක‍්‍රමය විශ්වාස කළේ නැහැ. මා සතු සියළු දැනුම ඔවුන්ට දී මා කිව්වේ එය අත්හදා බලන්න කියායි”.

මෙසේ කුඩා පරිමාන වී ගොවීන් ටික දෙනෙකුගෙන් පටන් ගත් කාම්බෝජයේ SRI ක‍්‍රමය වසර කිහිපයක් තුළ රට පුරා ව්‍යාප්ත වී ගියා. එය ඉබේ සිදු වුයේ නැහැ. කෝමා හා CEDAC ආයතනය ආදර්ශක කෙත් යායන් පවත්වා ගෙන ගියා. රට පුරා සංචාරය කරමින් ගොවීන්ට ශිල්පක‍්‍රම කියා දුන්නා. ගොවි සඟරාවක්, රේඩියෝ හා ටෙලිවිෂන් මාධ්‍ය හරහා අත්දැකීම් බෙදා ගත්තා.

“මා හැම විට ම අපේ ගොවීන්ට කියන්නේ පොතේ උගතුන් වන අප කියන දේ එක විට පිළි ගන්නට එපා. ඔබ ම අත්හදා බලන්න. ඔබේ ගැටළු විසඳමින් වැඩි අස්වනු ලබා දෙන ක‍්‍රමවේදයක් පමණක් දිගට ම භාවිත කරන්න.”

කෝමා, ගොවීන්ගේ සහජ බුද්ධිය හා ප‍්‍රායෝගික දැනුම ඉතා ඉහළින් අගය කරන අසාමාන්‍ය ගණයේ උගතෙක්. “ගොවිතැන් කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ලෝකයේ සිටින ඉහළ ම විශේෂඥයන් වන්නේ කුඩා පරිමාණයේ ගොවියන් හා ගෙවිලියන්. විද්‍යාව ෙසෙද්ධාන්තිකව උගත් අප වැනි අය ගොවීන්ගෙන් ගුරුහරුකම් ලද යුතුයි! ඔවුන්ගෙන් උගනිමින්, ඔවුන් සමඟ ගොවිතැනේ ගැටළු විසඳීම කළ යුතුයි!”

කෝමා මෙසේ කියන විට මට සිහි වන්නේ ආචාර්ය රේ විජේවර්ධනගේ එ සමාන ආකල්පයන්. (2011 අගෝස්තු 21 හා 28 කොලම් බලන්න.) මූණ ඉච්ඡවට ගොවි රජා හා ගොවි මහතා ආදී යෙදුම් භාවිතා කළත් අපේ පොතේ උගතුන් හා පර්යේෂකයන් ගොවීන් ගැන දරණ ආකල්ප මා හොඳාකාර දැක තිබෙනවා. ලොව පුරා මේ පොත-කෙත අතර පරතරය තිබෙනවා.

කාම්බෝජයේ කෘෂිවිද්‍යා උපාධිධාරීන් ගොවි බිමට ගෙන ගොස් ඔවුන් සැබැවින් ම ගොවිතැනට යොමු කරන්නට කෝමා උත්සාහ කරනවා. SRI ක‍්‍රමයේ සාර්ථකත්වයෙන් පසු ඔහු තෝරා ගෙන ඇති ඊටත් වඩා භාර දුර අභියෝගය නම් එරට ගතානුගතික සරසවි හා වෘත්තීය අධ්‍යාපන ක්‍ෂෙත‍්‍රයේ දැක්ම පුළුල් කිරීමයි.

“මා හැම ගොවියකු ම දකින්නේ මනුෂ්‍යයකු හැටියටයි. ඔවුන්ට උපතින් ලද සහජ බුද්ධියත්, කුසලතාවයත් තිබෙනවා. එයට අමතරව අප බොහෝ දෙනාට නැති ප‍්‍රායෝගික අත්දැකීම් රැසක් තිබෙනවා. අප උත්සාහ කරන්නේ ගොවීන්ට ගෞරවාන්විතව සළකමින් ඔවුන් සමඟ සහයෝගයෙන් ගොවිතැන් කටයුතු වඩාත් ඵලදායී හා පරිසර හිතකාමී කරන්නටයි.” ඔහු කියනවා.

පරිසර හිතකාමී ගොවිතැනේදී අළුත් සංකල්ප හා ක‍්‍රමවේදයන් ගොවින් තුළින් ඉස්මතු කිරිමේ අරමුණින් ආසියාව හා අප‍්‍රිකාව පුරා කි‍්‍රයාත්මක වන PROLINNOVA නම් පර්යේෂණ ජාලයකට 2004 සිට CEDAC ආයතනය සම්බන්ධ වී සිටිනවා. මේ ජාලයේ දශකයක ක‍්‍රියාකාරකම් ගැන කෙටි වාර්තා චිත‍්‍රපට මාලාවක් 2010-11දී මා නිෂ්පාදනය කළා. එහි එක් කතාවක් සඳහා අප තෝරා ගත්තේ කාම්බෝජයේ ප‍්‍රති-හරිත විප්ලවයයි.

“ගොවියාට සවන් දෙන්න. ඔහුගේ මතයට ගරු කරන්න. සෙමින් සෙමින් පවත්නා තත්ත්වය වෙනස් කරන්න!” විනාඩි 40ක් පුරා ඔහු පටිගත කළ විඩියෝ සම්මුඛ සාකච්ඡව පුරා නැවත නැවතත් කීවේ මෙයයි. සාකච්ඡවේ ඉංග‍්‍රිසි පිටපත කියවන්න http://tiny.cc/KomaInt

විද්‍යා ගුරුකුලවාදයක් හෝ දේශපාලන මතවාදයක් හෝ කුමන්ත‍්‍රණ මානසිකත්වයක් නැති මේ දාර්ශනික කෘෂි විද්‍යාඥයාට අවශ්‍ය කාම්බෝජයේ ගොවීන්ගේ ජිවන මට්ටම නඟා සිටුවමින් එරට පරිසරය හා සොබා සම්පත් රැක ගැනීමයි. ඔවුන් දෙදෙනා කිසි දිනෙක මුණ නොගැසුනත්, කාම්බෝජයේ රේ විජේවර්ධන හැටියට යං සයින් කෝමා මා දකින්නේ එ නිසයි.

කෙටි වාර්තා චිත‍්‍රපට නරඹන්න: http://tiny.cc/ProFilms

Breaking News on a Restless Planet: Covering Disasters in a Networked Society

Communicating Disasters: ZiF Conference in Bielefeld
How do we cope with a warming planet while living in an increasingly WikiLeakable world? Exactly one year ago, I explored this in my talk given at the University of Colombo during the LEAF Conference.

As I reflected then: “We live in a crisis-ridden world where we have to cope with multiple emergencies unfolding at the same time, impacting us on different fronts. This illustration captures three of them: crisis in biodiversity, man-made climate change, and the new reality of living in a rapidly WikiLeakable world — what I called the Global Glass House.”

I returned to this theme and explored it further this week when giving a keynote address at the Bielefeld University in Germany. I was participating in their international and inter-disciplinary conference on “Dealing with the Disaster of Others”, 26-28 January 2012. The conference was the culmination of a year-long research project on this theme carried out at the University’s Centre for Interdisciplinary Research (ZiF).

I also built on ideas initially discussed in my 2007 book, Communicating Disasters, which was part of the reference material used during th ZiF research project.

Nalaka Gunawardene speaks at ZiF Conference on Communicating Disasters, Bielefeld, Germany: 27 Jan 2012

Here’s the Summary (Abstract) of my talk. PowerPoint slides below.

Breaking News on a Restless Planet: Covering Disasters in a Networked Society

by Nalaka Gunawardene
Science Writer, Blogger & Columnist; Director – TVE Asia Pacific (TVEAP)

Communicating disasters — before, during and after they happen — is fraught with many challenges. The increased volume and flow of information, enabled by the proliferation of information and communication technologies (ICTs), fills some gaps — but not all. Other critical elements such as institution building, training and awareness raising are needed at all levels to create societies that are better informed and prepared.

The news media, driven by their quest for what is new, true and interesting, can be useful allies for disaster managers. But the nexus between these two groups has always been contentious, and the acceleration of the news cycle has made it more so. Having to sustain 24/7 coverage for their fragmented and distracted audiences places enormous pressures on news media to break news first — and reflect later. In this scenario, how can empathetic, ethical and balanced reporting happen?

As disasters increase in frequency and intensity partly due to climate change, mainstream media practitioners across Asia struggle to keep up. Disasters are more drawn out (e.g. Pakistan floods, 2010 & Thailand floods, 2011), geographically scattered (Indian Ocean tsunami, 2004) and economically devastating (Tohoku/Fukushima, 2011) than before. This stretches the capacities and resources of many news organisations. Saturation coverage of unfolding disasters can also cause ‘compassion fatigue’ and apathy in audiences.

In today’s networked society, news media are no longer the sole gatherers or distributors of news. Without the trappings and inertia of the institutionalised media, citizen journalists are quick to adopt ICT tools and platforms. What does this mean for communicating disasters that requires care and sensitivity? In which ways can we find synergy between mainstream and new/social media to better serve the public interest on a warming planet? What value-additions can the mainstream media still offer to the coverage of disasters near and far?

We examine these and other larger questions with reference to recent disasters in Asia.

Here’s the PPT:

Asia Pacific Rice Film Award 2008/09 – And the winner is…

Winners of the Asia Pacific Rice Film Award 2008-2009 were announced this week. The award was established ‘to recognise excellence in audio-visual creations on rice-related issues in Asia, where most of the world’s rice is grown and consumed’.

The co-organisers, Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific (PAN AP), TVE Asia Pacific (TVEAP) and Public Media Agency (PMA) of Malaysia, invited innovative film-makers from the Asia Pacific region to submit short creative television, video or cinematic films on rice. I was part of the regional panel of judges.

The film winning the first prize is titled SRI – Challenging Traditions, Transforming Lives (10 mins, 2008). It is directed by Gautam Chintamani in Haryana, India.

I found it a well-focused, positive story compellingly told, with an unhurried script — just enough information, not bombarding the viewer with facts and figures. It’s about a new, more efficient way of growing rice called System of Rice Intensification (SRI).

But this is far from a boring instructional film. It focuses on lives of farmers on and off the field (e.g. SRI’s benefits to women farmers – such as less labour and time intensive). The visual experience is completed by the excellent camera work, sound track and seamless editing – altogether a highly professional production that is also a persuasive advocacy film.

Here’s the official synopsis for the film, taken from Vatavaran 2009 film festival website:
A revolutionary method, System of Rice Intensification (SRI) requires almost no standing water for paddy to grow and is fast transforming the rice cultivation. Developed by a French priest Henri De Launi in the 1980’s in Madagascar, SRI not only uses almost half of the water required but drastically reduces the physical labor associated with rice farming besides increasing the yield by almost one and a half times. For a country like India rice is more than just a mere crop.

There are myths attached to its cultivation. While SRI offers an alternate and a very sustainable method of growing rice it also battles hard with the age-old traditional approach of growing rice. The perils of global warming, the drying up of perennial rivers and the excessive use of fertilizers pose numerous threats to rice cultivation; making life very hard for the humble farmer. SRI offers a workable solution to all problems related to traditional rice cultivation.

SRI- Challenging Tradition, Transforming Lives looks at how SRI is helping the modern farmer cultivate India’s traditional crop without the burden that it had become. In addition the film highlights the transformation in the lives of millions of women who toil the hardest in Indian farmers thanks to SRI reducing the need for manual labor. To its critics the System of Rice Intensification might not be the greatest thing but the fact that SRI significantly reduces the demand for water for rice cultivation makes it worthwhile in the current scenario of the world.

Starting out in 2001-02, Gautam Chintamani worked in the capacity of Associate Producer on India’s first daily news spoof show Khabarein Khabardar. There on he did freelance writing for numerous shows for MTV, Sony and Zee amongst others. He has written and directed an 18 min short film, Alterations. In addition to writing for television Gautam Chintamani regualraly writes for the print and electronic media. He has extensively written for Man’s World, Hard News, Media Trans-Asia and MidDay, rediff.com and Buzz in Town. Gautam also worked in the capacity of Associate Director and Executive Producer of the Hindi feature film, Amavas. Of his television work the law drama, Siddhanth (Star One) was nominated for an Emmy in the International Drama section. Gautam’s episode dealing with an HIV positive college student who fights for her basic right to education was selected as a case study for a Writers workshop conducted by Hero’s Group in Hyderabad & Chennai.

Piyal Parakrama (1960 – 2010): Another hasty departure…

Piyal Parakkrama in Sri Lanka 2048 TV show

Piyal Parakrama died so suddenly and unexpectedly on the night of March 3 that it’s hard to believe that he is no longer among us. Another public-spirited individual has left the public space all too soon.

Piyal combined the roles of environmentalist, educator, researcher and media personality. He was also a colleague who became a friend, and a fellow traveller for many years.

In a public career spanning 30 years, he wore multiple hats, among them: Executive Director of the Centre for Environmental and Nature Studies, founder President of the Nature Conservation Group (NatCog), President of the Green Party of Sri Lanka, and consultant to various state and academic institutions. He also worked for the now-defunct Sri Lanka Environmental Congress (SLEC) and now dormant Sri Lanka Environmental Television Project (SLETP).

But Piyal Parakrama was more than an amalgamation of these parts: he was his own distinctive brand — admired, trusted or feared by different sections of society. Even his ardent detractors (and he had a few) would readily agree that he gave far more to the public good than he took back personally.

Piyal’s forte was biodiversity. His interest and knowledge were nurtured first at the Young Zoologists Association (YZA) – where he remained a volunteer for 30 years – and later at the Lumumba Friendship University in Russia, where he studied biology from 1983 to 1986.

In searching for viable solutions for entrenched conservation problems, Piyal collaborated with scientists, educators, journalists, school children and local activists. Some industrialists and investors simply hated his guts, while concerned researchers and government officials sometimes gave him sensitive information which he could make public in ways they couldn’t.

Given our common interests in development issues and the media, Piyal and I moved in partly overlapping circles. Our paths crossed frequently, and we shared public platforms, newspaper space and broadcast airtime. We even worked together for a few months in the late 1990s at the SLETP. His communications skills were invaluable in rendering a number of international environmental films into Sinhala.

Piyal Parakrama (left) on the set of Sri Lanka 2048 - debate on Water Management

The last time we collaborated was in such a media venture. In mid 2008, Piyal joined an hour-long TV debate we produced as part of the Sri Lanka 2048 series. The show discussed the various choices and trade-offs that had to be made today to create a more sustainable Sri Lanka over the next 40 years. Taking such a long term view is rare in our professional and media spheres preoccupied with the challenges of now and here (or restricted in vision by short-termism).

Piyal could speak authoritatively on several topics we covered in the 10-part series, but I invited him to the one on managing freshwater, one of Sri Lanka’s once abundant but now threatened natural resources. With his deep knowledge and understanding of traditional water and soil conservation systems, he was truly in his element in that debate. He was also the ‘star’ among the diverse panel and studio audience we had carefully assembled.

I’m working on a longer tribute where I try to position Piyal’s role in Sri Lanka’s conservation movement. Watch this space…

TWTYTW: Our own (very subjective) list of best and worst of 2009…

All journalism is subjective; it’s just that some of us are better at disguising it! As we head for the end of 2009, we at Moving Images blog take one last fleeting, impressionistic, judgemental and, yes, darn too opinionated look at the past 365 days. That Was The Year That Was…and here’s our list of superlatives!

Best news and biggest relief (national): Sri Lanka’s nearly three decades long and brutal civil war finally ended in mid May 2009 – and not a moment too soon. It rightly created headlines around the world, and also made it to TIME’s top 10 news of the year. Within 24 hours of that much-awaited news, I wrote and published one of my most emotionally charged essays ever, Memories of War, Dreams of Peace. I probably spoke for a whole generation of Lankans: “As we stand on the threshold of peace, I am overwhelmed with memories of our collective tragedy. I hope we can once again resume our long suspended dreams for a better today and tomorrow.” With the hindsight of seven months, I still want to believe every word…although it’s become increasingly hard to cling on to such ideals.

Biggest disappointment (national): Ending the Lankan war entailed tremendous effort, cost and sacrifice, and we all knew that consolidating peace and restoring normalcy were going to be even harder – delivering peace dividends is no mean task. As weeks became months, our cautious optimism slowly turned into disappointment and dismay: it became clear that the triumphalist government was treating the historic ‘open moment’ simply as as blank cheque to do pretty much what it wanted. My May 19 essay on Dreams of Peace had ended with a question that resonated with millions: “Would our leaders now choose the Mandela Road or the Mugabe Road for the journey ahead?” Can we please ask that question again…? Hello, anybody listening?

Most evocative piece of writing: Without competition, that distinction goes to The Last Editorial by Lasantha Wickrematunga, the courageous investigative journalist (and de facto leader of the political opposition) in Sri Lanka, who was brutally slain on January 8 while on his way to work. That editorial, which appeared post-humously in his newspaper The Sunday Leader on 11 January 2009, embodies the best of Lasantha’s liberal, secular and democratic views. Nearly a year after the dastardly daylight crime, his killers have not been caught and independent media remains under siege even in post-war Sri Lanka.

Most memorable quote: While people like Lasantha articulated our cherished dreams for a truly pluralistic society, our billion+ neighbours in India have been building it for over six decades. It’s still a work in progress, and the ideals need occasional reiteration. This is precisely what classical dancer Mallika Sarabhai did when she ran as an independent candidate when India conducted the world’s largest democratic election in April-May. She lost, but wrote one of the most insightful pieces on what it means to live amidst the huge cultural, social and political diversity in India: “We are a salad-like melange of cultures and not a soup where all variations get reduced to a homogeneous pulp—this, to me, is our greatest strength.” (She inspired my own essay: Sri Lanka – Spice Island or Bland Nation?)

Biggest disappointment (global):
The UN climate conference in Copenhagen, held in December and officially dubbed COP15, ended up in what many activists felt was a cop-out. Greenpeace echoed the frustration of many when they said at the end of what was, at its start, billed as the ’14 days to seal seal history’s judgment on this generation‘: “Don’t believe the hype, there is nothing fair, ambitious or legally binding about this deal. The job of world leaders is not done. Today they shamefully failed to save us all from the effects of catastrophic climate change.” I was glad I wasn’t part of the mega event — I’ve burnt enough aviation fuel this year, but almost all events I participated in on three continents were more productive than the Danish debacle…

Biggest Under-achiever: If the world laboured a mountain and delivered a mouse in Copenhagen, the mid-wife of that process must surely have been the current UN chief Ban Ki Moon. More secretary than general, Ban is, in his own admission, the UN’s Invisible Man. All the top speech writers and PR agents in the world can’t animate this the perennially dull and dour diplomat. Not ideal change-maker when the world is racing against catastrophe. Kofi Annan, we miss you!

Most moving work of moving images: The world’s rich are having a party, and millions living in poverty are the ones footing the bill. This is the premise of Indian journalist and activist Pradip Saha’s latest film, MEAN Sea Level, which looks at the impact of climate change on the inhabitants of Ghoramara and Sagar islands in the the Sundarban delta region in the Bay of Bengal. I found it both deeply moving and very ironic. With minimal narration, he allows the local people to tell their own story. As it turned out, these testimonies were lost on the bickering politicians in Copenhagen…

Best media stunts: We are a bit divided here. At a time of ever-shrinking attention spans, it takes much creativity and guts to grab the cacophonous media’s attention, especially for a good cause. Two very different men succeeded where many have failed. In February Bill Gates, the world’s top geek now working for its meek, released some mosquitoes at the TED 2009 conference to highlight the continuing grip that malaria has on the developing world, especially Africa. In October, climate crusader President Mohamed Nasheed of the Maldives held the world’s first underwater cabinet meeting to remind everyone of the watery future that awaits low lying island nations like his when climate change rises sea levels.

Biggest Irony: NASA announced in November that an unmanned space probe that was intentionally crashed on the Moon had discovered the presence of ‘significant amounts’ of water there. That bit of scientific evidence cost US$79 million to obtain…and was not the most comforting news for a planet that rapidly running short of usable freshwater. In the wake of the Apollo Moon landings in the late 1960s, misguided voters in Sri Lanka elected a government that promised ‘to bring rice even from the Moon’. When might we hear politicians promise us water from the Moon?

Well, that’s it folks — the highs and lows of 2009 according to the Blogger-in-Chief and his team of elves here at the Moving Images Media Empire. We’ve waded through our several dozen blog posts to come up with the above, and make no claims for being fair, balanced or comprehensive…

Indeed, we hope you don’t agree with all our picks, and invite you to express alternative – even dissenting – views. All comments that are not outright libellous or blatantly self-promotional will be published.

We take this opportunity to thank each and everyone who read our posts over the year — and especially those who left comments, sometimes radically disagreeing with our views. We also reiterate our pledge to frustrate those few persistent detractors who keep demanding to see our nationalistic, religious or other credentials…

May the cacophony continue and intensify in 2010!

The Toilet is still a luxury for 2.5 billion people worldwide…

No laughing matter, this...

It had to happen sooner or later: a world day dedicated to, ahem, toilets. When all sorts of public interest causes are claiming the 365 days of our year, it was only a matter of time.

19 November is World Toilet Day – a day to celebrate the humble, yet vitally important, toilet and to raise awareness of the global sanitation crisis. It was established in 2001 by the World Toilet Organization (the other WTO!), a global non- profit organization committed to improving toilet and sanitation conditions worldwide.

The World Toilet Day promotes the importance of toilet sanitation and each person’s right to a safe and hygienic sanitary environment.

Did you know, for instance:
* 2.5 billion people do not have somewhere safe, private or hygienic to go to the toilet?
* One gram of faeces can contain 10 million viruses, one million bacteria, 1,000 parasite cysts and 100 parasite eggs?

Here’s a cool viral video that WaterAid have produced to mark the event:

A third of the world’s population lacks any toilets. The rest of us who do have a toilet don’t always make the most efficient use of it – when we typically use 10 litres of water to flush away one litre of urine, that’s not very thrifty, is it?

On this day, I came across an interesting essay by Debra Shore, Commissioner, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, in The Huffington Post. She writes: “Using freshwater in toilets is not smart and it is not sustainable. I believe the homes of the future will be designed to use “grey” water — the water from our washing machines and dishwashers, the water from our showers and from rain captured in barrels and cisterns — to flush our toilets. This kind of redesign of water use, both residential and industrial, will be one of the growth industries of coming decades.”

She adds: “So, on World Toilet Day, here is my plea: monitor your water use. Think about ways to conserve water. And consider how lucky we are.”

Rose George, author of The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters says toilets are a privilege that nearly half the world still lacks. At least 2.6 billion people around the planet have no access to a toilet — and that doesn’t just mean that they don’t have a nice, heated indoor bathroom. It means they have nothing — not a public toilet, not an outhouse, not even a bucket. They defecate in public, contaminating food and drinking water, and the disease toll due to unsanitized human waste is staggering. George notes that 80% of the world’s illnesses are caused by fecal matter.

Read more: Toilet Tales: Inside the World of Waste, by Bryan Walsh in TIME, Nov 2008

Calculate your water footprint

Blog post in July 2007: A Silent Emergency: More television sets than toilets!

Blog post in July 2007: Faecal Attraction: There’s no such thing as a convenient flush…

VULNERABLE: Still images of a moving story…from Bluepeace, in the Maldives

bluepeace-maldives2
Bluepeace at 20: Voices from the waves...

Bluepeace, the first environmental organisation in the Maldives, recently marked their 20th anniversary.

In November 1989, less than three months after Bluepeace was formed, the first small states conference on sea level rise was held in the Maldives. As a dramatic conclusion to the conference, a demonstration was held in Male’, in which students and the general public spoke on the imminent dangers of living in a low-lying country. A large billboard placed by Bluepeace asked the question “Do you know we are just four feet above sea level?”

Bluepeace was vocal, even at 2 months. Photo by Nalaka Gunawardene: Male, November 1989

I’m not a professional photographer, but as a journalist I often carry a camera and take photos of what interests me. So I’m very glad to have captured that historic bill board as a journalist covering the conference. Bluepeace still uses it in their records, always with acknowledgement.

Ali Rilwan, Bluepeace co-founder whom I photographed as a young man, says: “Twenty years later, we need not ask the same question, as the world is well-aware of the dangers Maldives faces. However, we face the urgent need to talk and work with the rest of the world to find solutions.”

Now, Bluepeace is actively using photographs as part of their climate advocacy.

vulnerable-photo-exhibition09
Images from the frontlines of climate impact...

VULNERABLE is a photo exhibition organised by Bluepeace. To celebrate the 20th anniversary of Bluepeace, and to join the global environmental movement bringing attention to the dangers of climate change in the run up to United Nations Conference on Climate Change (COP15), Bluepeace presents VULNERABLE, which showcases the face of climate change in the Maldives. The exhibition documents the vulnerability of the fragile coral islands of the Maldives to climate change, through pictures from talented Maldivian photographers. It depicts a nation under threat, as it tries to safeguard an age-old culture and lifestyle that could be erased with rising seas and climate change.

VULNERABLE was launched online on October 24, the International Day of Climate Action organised by 350.org, which calls for a reduction of global carbon emissions below 350 parts per million.

In the coming weeks and months the exhibition will move to different locations in the Maldives and other countries, including Copenhagen in December 2009, where it will be hosted by Klimaforum09, an alternate climate summit with participation from global environmental movements and civil society organisations.

I can’t wait to see the exhibit in a physical display, which is more powerful than viewing it online. For now, here are some glimpses…

vulnerable image
Under seige from the deep blue?

vulnerable3

Mekong: A river to watch as climate change impacts Asia’s water tower

Calm now, turbulent tomorrow? View of Upper Mun Reservoir on the Mekong in northern Thailand: image courtesy TVE Asia Pacific
Calm now, turbulent tomorrow? View of Upper Mun Reservoir on the Mekong in northern Thailand: image courtesy TVE Asia Pacific
The Greater Himalaya region is known as the water tower of Asia: the continent’s nine largest rivers emerging from its ice-capped mountains provide 1.5 billion people with water and 3 billion people with their food and power.

With more ice stored here than anywhere outside the Arctic and Antarctic, the region has even been called the earth’s third pole. But the ice fields of the Himalayas are melting, and at a faster pace than anywhere else on the planet.

A river that is going to be affected is the Mekong – one of Asia’s major rivers, and the twelfth longest in the world. TVE Asia Pacific has just produced a short film looking at how current and anticipated environmental changes could impact water users in the six countries of Southeast Asia which share its waters. We released it online this week, just in time for World Water Day 2009, March 22.

Mekong: Watch that River!

Along its journey of nearly 5,000 kilometres (3,000 miles), the Mekong nurtures a great deal of life in its waters – and in the wetlands, forests, towns and villages along its path. Starting in the Tibetan highlands, it flows through China’s Yunan province, and then across Myanmar, Thailand, Laos and Cambodia…before entering the sea from southern Vietnam.

The Mekong River Basin is the land surrounding all the streams and rivers that flow into it. This covers a vast area roughly the size of France and Germany combined. The basin supports more than 65 million people who share Mekong waters for drinking, farming, fishing and industry. Along the way, the river also generates electricity for South East Asia’s emerging economies.

The Mekong has sustained life for thousands of years. But growing human demands are slowly building up environmental pressures on the river. A new study, commissioned by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), cautions that climate change could add to this in the coming years.

Fishing on the Tonle Sap lake in Cambodia: An 'ecological hot spot' on the Mekong
Fishing on the Tonle Sap lake in Cambodia: An 'ecological hot spot' on the Mekong
The study, carried out under a project named “Vulnerability Assessment of Freshwater Resources”, was headed by Dr Mukand Babel at the Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) in Bangkok. It probed how climate change can impact the river from the highlands to the delta….affecting the survival and prosperity of millions.

Dr Babel says on the film: “Climate change would affect…the amount of rainfall which is received. Under climate change conditions, we expect less rainfall to be observed and that would bring less flows in the river which would affect the water users in the downstream areas.”

He adds: “At the same time, the sea level rise which is an associated impact of climate change, would bring more sea water intrusion into the river systems and groundwater systems in the delta in Vietnam.”

Salt water could go upstream by 60 to 70 kilometres, degrading the land and water in the Mekong delta. This would add to pressures already coming from growing human numbers, expanding economies and disappearing forests.

So the Mekong will be affected at both ends, by different processes that are triggered by climate change.

To find out how these changes could affect the Mekong’s millions, my colleagues filmed in two
‘ecological hot spots’ in the river basin identified by the study: the Upper Mun River, a tributary of the Mekong, and the Tonlé Sap lake in Cambodia.

The UNEP-AIT study recommends Mekong river countries to improve how they manage their water and land. This needs better policies, institutions and systems.

Dr. Young-Woo Park, Regional Director, UNEP, says on the film: “Countries sharing the Mekong river…have to act together and they have to develop the policies on how to conserve and how to conserve the Mekong river and also how to properly manage the Mekong river.”

The study found the Mekong river basin ‘moderately vulnerable’ to environmental changes. There aren’t any major water shortages in this river basin as yet. For now, the Mekong is holding up despite many pressures.
But all this can change if less water is flowing down the river and the demand for water keeps growing.

That’s why we named this film ‘Mekong: Watch that River!’